GIS5935 Module 2.2: Surface Interpolation
In this lab, we sought to use different interpolation methods to determine which would be the best to most accurately depict the BOD (Biochemical Oxygen Demand) within the Tampa Bay area in Florida. We explored Thiessen, Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW), and Spline (Regularized and Tension) methods.
Thiessen interpolation advantages include the
interpolated surface equaling the values of each given sample point, which
means there isn’t a difference between the true and interpolated values.
Disadvantages include the abrupt change of between values at the edges of the
polygons this interpolation method outputs. While Thiessen interpolation is
good for sampled locations, it may not be as accurate around unsampled
locations.
IDW averages values and determines the weight based
off point cell proximity. This method assumes points closer to one another are
more alike and is good for more evenly distributed, uniform, dense points.
Spline interpolation will estimate values that passes
through input points and allows for an overall smooth curved surface result.
Regularized:
High weight values = smoother surface
Tension:
High weight values = coarser surface, with closer conformity to control points
If I had
to pick one technique to develop a good description of BOD concentrations of
Tampa Bay, Florida, I would pick the Spline Tension method depicted above. Points are not
evenly distributed at the bottom of the study area, otherwise the Inverse
Distance Weighted (IDW) technique may have been more appropriate. Spline
Tension appears to reflect the water quality of the area more accurately as it
keeps values closer to the data points, as well as maintains a relatively
smooth curved surfaces that one may expect from water.

Comments
Post a Comment